Surely, our new Luzerne County Council would never hire a county manager who does not have his own financial affairs in order.

Having said that, we’ll reserve judgment on The Citizens’ Voice’s big scoop that the “preferred candidate” to manage the county is a management analyst from California.  The Voice also reported that another finalist is a former deputy county administrator from South Carolina whom was fired from his job.

The council members, who have remained mum on the finalists for this very important and powerful position, have said that the top three candidates are all top notch.  So we all need to wait for more information because, frankly, the Voice’s article was cause for a little concern.

The “preferred candidate,” according to the Voice’s anonymous sources is Robert Lawton, a principal management analyst for Solano County in central California.  Sounds good so far, but then county Controller Walter Griffith stepped in and burst our balloon.

Walter told the Voice that Lawton told him that not only was he a finalist but that he also had problems making mortgage payments on properties he owned.

Why in the world would anyone vying for the top management job in Luzerne County reveal that he can’t make his own mortgage payments to someone not even on the selection committee? Did he mention this to the incoming council members or just to Walter?

Griffith said he’s not saying Mr. Lawton isn’t qualified, just that he didn’t “know the history of his foreclosure,” noting that he ”would be in charge of a $121 million budget.”

Who said anything about foreclosures?

Griffith also expressed concern that Mr. Lawton may be unable to obtain bonding from an insurer.  To that we say, if that minor detail doesn’t concern the council, maybe Walter should take a chill pill.

Transition committee Chairman Jim Bobeck responded that Griffith’s comments were “a mischaracterization of information.”  If that is true, Griffith has done a disservice to the Citizens Voice’s readers by spreading innuendo and to Mr. Lawton himself. 

Frankly, it’s hard to imagine that the incoming council, whose every move will be watched, would botch up its first critical duty.

Then again, who can forget the time the county commissioners trumpeted its hiring of a new human resources director, whom The Times Leader later outed as a shop lifter?

Well, at least for now, the county seems to be in good hands with the interim appointment of former county budget and finance chief, Tom Pribula.

Let’s hope that we can say the same about the permanent appointee.

- Betty Roccograndi

Share
 

Don’t do it, Steve.

“Urban may pass on county council seat,” The Times Leader reported Friday.  The newspaper’s conjecture is based on Urban’s remark that he will vote against giving the courts more funding “if I get sworn in as a council member.”  If?

Of course, the plan is to swear Urban in next week along with his son and the nine other newly-elected members of our first county council.  History is being made, and Urban will be part of it, maybe.

After a distinguished career as county commissioner, would Steve Urban really stick it to all those Luzerne County residents who voted for him?  If he walks away now, for whatever reason, the 10 council members will pick his replacement, overriding everyone who voted for him.

That would not be fair to us, unless he has a darn good reason for winning the election only to bow out.  If  he was unsure he wanted to serve on the council, he should not have run in the first place.

Urban would neither confirm nor deny whether he will serve after he dropped that bombshell at the last commissioners meeting Thursday.

Could it be because he isn’t exactly  hitting it off with two of his fellow council members?

Urban said Jim Bobeck would not be an effective chairperson of the new 11-member county council because he was not an effective one for the Home Rule transition committee.

Ouch!

Urban also noted that Bobeck’s father’s employer has contracts with the county.  He vowed to  make sure that all council members are aware of this potential conflict of interest.

We kind of  think he already did that via the TL’s article, unless all of the incoming council members don’t read The Times Leader.  Big mistake.  It is imperative that the council members read both local papers because sometimes you have to in order to get the full story or on occasion, the story at all.

Then there was the scuffle with councilman-elect Edward Brominski, a long ago county commissioner.  Brominski walked out of a transmission committee meeting this week after Urban attacked Bobeck’s effectiveness.

“I don’t want to sit and listen to his garbage anymore,” Brominski said, according to The Times Leader. “I don’t even want to sit here and listen to his nonsense any more,”  Brominski said, according to The Citizens’ Voice.  See what I mean about the need to read both papers.

Is this what we’re in for?  Council members walking out of meetings if they don’t like what they’re hearing.  And council members publicly questioning each other’s effectiveness?

Are we moving on?  Will our new leaders act like adults?

We hope so, but after these two displays, we’re left to wonder.

And now we’re left to wonder whether Steve Urban will do the honorable thing and not let down the voters who elected him to serve.

No one said it was going to be easy.  Just ask the new, yet unidentified county manager, who has to decide whether to raise our taxes even higher or fire up to 150 employeees.

When you’re making your New Year’s resolutions, you might want to promise to attend as many county council meetings as possible.  They’re shaping us to be pretty interesting.

- Betty Roccograndi 

Share
 

A mixed bag to be sure.

With all the pressure, tension, hurt feelings, stepped on toes, screaming and tired kids, sheer exhaustion, getting through the holidays in one piece, physically and emotionally, is a challenge indeed.  I doubt that anyone would disagree.

Being a rather private person, I’ll keep most of my Christmas memories this year to myself.

But I just heard a very, very funny story that can be shared since I won’t in any way identify the person who provided me with a much needed post Christmas chuckle.

He, like the fortunate among us, shared Christmas with a big family.  Joining them this year was his brother’s new wife.  The problem is the brother never told anyone he was getting married – for the third time to his long-time girlfriend.  What better way to break such festive news than on Christmas Eve.

Well, maybe not.

Of course, everyone was stunned – especially his children from previous marriages.  One of the daughters, whom we’ll call Holly, didn’t take too kindly to being kept in the dark about a pretty important family matter.

Needless to say, Holly, who is a newlywed, wasn’t exactly filled with mirth at the unexpected news of Dad’s nuptials.  And we’re guessing that her new husband was a bit surprised at his wife’s reaction when she pouted and said, ”The next time I get married, I’m not telling anybody.”

You have to admit, that’s pretty funny, although the new husband may still be wondering if his days of marital bliss are numbered.

Okay, I’ll share one family story with  you only because I don’t believe my nephew-in-law will mind, especially if I give him a plug.  He’s former Pepperjam CEO Kris Jones, who now partners witih The Scranton Times offering deals on Refer/Local.  And since Kris is not one to dodge the limelight, I’m sure he’s okay with Pure Bunkum readers hearing how he surprised his wife on Christmas.

You have to hand it to Kris, he’s quite ingenious.  I would have guessed that my  niece, Robyn, would have opened an expensive piece of jewelry or trip tickets to some exotic island.  But that’s too mundane.

Nope, Kris arranged for Robyn to be the guest chef tonight at Mohegan Sun’s Rustic Kitchen.  With the assistance of the restaurant’s chefs, Robyn, with the cameras rolling, will orchestrate a lavish dinner for 15 of her friends.  It won’t be broadcast, but she’ll receive the videotape of “Cooking With Robyn,” which is the next best thing to actually experiencing what it’s like to be Rachel Ray or Paula Deen.

So, good for you, Kris, for coming up with a real surprise, even though it meant my sister having to cancel her holiday party because of it, and now I have to fend for myself tonight.

Hope you all had a wonderful Christmas – and lived to tell the tale.

- Betty Roccograndi

 

Share
 

In the FOR CRYING OUT LOUD section of the newspaper, we learned that an anti-religion group will allow a Nativity scene at a Pennsylvania municipal building  - on one condition.

If they want to keep their 50-year Christmas tradition, city officials in Ellwood City, which is not far from Ptttsburgh, must hang a banner declaring that, “Religion is but myth and superstition that hardens hearts and enslaves minds,” according to an AP report.

Wow, who put arsenic in their eggnog?

If religion is a myth, then millions, probably billions, around the globe are being bamboozled.  I think not.

This group, which calls itself the “Freedom From Religion Foundation,” makes Ebeneezer Scrooge look like the good-natured Mr. Fezziwig from Dickens’ “A Christmas Carol.”

When are the majority of people going to stand up to these zealots?  It’s Christmas whether they like it or not.  And despite the inordinate commercialism that comes with the holiday, churches are still packed on Christmas Eve and Christmas Day.  For millions of Americans, it is the day we celebrate the birth of Jesus Christ.

Would these same people scream and rant if confronted with someone burning the American flag on public property.  No, they wouldn’t take offense to that.  They’d hoot and holler in support.

All it took was for one King’s College atheist a few years ago to threaten a lawsuit for the Luzerne County commissioners to bow to his demands and water down what was once a beautiful Christmas display on the courthouse lawn.  Side by side with the menorah, the display was cheapened with the inclusion of a chintzy, plastic Rudolph, Frosty and candy canes.

Hey, don’t get us wrong, we like Rudolph and Frosty as much as anyone, but they’re out of their league mingling with the Wise Men, Mary and Joseph and the baby wrapped in swaddling clothes.  Go ahead, ACLU, arrest us for discriminating against a snowman.  Before you know it, the ACLU will threaten to sue if anyone even says, “Merry Christmas,” on public  property.

So proud of herself, Freedom from Religion co-founder Annie Lauie Gaylor said she was delighted that Ellood officials buckled and decided to move the Christmas display to private property to avoid a lawsuit against taxpayers, most of whom, we’d bet, have no problem whatsoever with the Christmas display.

“Reason has prevailed,” Annie declared.

No, what has prevailed is intolerance and a win for those few among us who believe that religion is a myth and that it hardens souls.

We should feel sorry for them.

MERRY CHRISTMAS, everyone.  To you too, Annie.

- Betty Roccograndi

Share
 

Now we can’t even trust “60 Minutes” to provide an unbiased report.

Correspondent Steve Kroft interviewed Barack Obama on Dec. 11.  The broadcast omitted the part where the president insinuated that as far as accomplishments go, he is not far behind Abraham Lincoln, FDR and Lyndon Johnson.

“”As you said yourself, Steve, you know, I would put our legislative and foreign policy accomplishments in our first two years against any president – with the possible exceptions of Johnson, F.D.R. and Lincoln – just in terms of what we’ve gotten done in modern history.”

Kroft did not burst out laughing nor did he challenge that absurd self-praise, which was left out of the  televised broadcast.  Some bloggers exposed this supreme expression of arrogance when they viewed the full interview online at “60 Minutes Overtime.”

Did you notice Obama said, “with the possible exceptions” of doing more for the country than Abe Lincoln?

Unbelievable.

The powers that be at 60 Minutes probably understood that viewers would have rolled their eyes if they heard Obama compare himself to FDR on national TV but also knew they couldn’t leave it out entirely, so they buried it elsewhere.

“Selective Editing: CBS News Omits Embarrassing Obama Boast from TV Interview,” wrote “Big Journalism.”

Obama’s “radiance shines so bright that it dazzled Steve Kroft to the extent that he didn’t even bother to ask an obvious follow-up question,” wrote blogger P.J Gladnick.

Yeah, like, with all due respect, Mr. President, what are you smoking?

“You have got to be kidding,” said Gateway Pundit’s Jim Hoft. “After destroying the American economy, tripling the national debt, blowing a trillion dollars on a failed stimulus plan and nearly doubling the unemployment rate, Barack Obama told “60 Minutes” last week that he considered himself the 4th best president in US history.”

No, Jim, he said with the “possible” exceptions of Lincoln, Roosevelt and Johnson, he accomplished the most.  For all we know, Barack Obama considers himself the best president in US history – with the possible exception of Jimmy Carter.

“60 Minutes” told POLITICO, which published the above comments on its website, that it doesn’t discuss its editorial process but that it “made the entire interview available to all on our webcast.”

Tick, Tick, Tick, Tick, Tick.  He! He! He! He! He!

- Betty Roccograndi

Share
 

“I don’t care about political implications.  We will stay here as long as it takes in order to do what’s right for the American people,” said U.S. Rep. Tom Reed, a New York Republican.

“Democrats gleefully distributed evidence of GOP disagreement,” the AP reported.  Gleefully.  Real grown-up of them.

We’re talking about the face-off over the payroll tax cut extension.  The Republican-controlled House wants to extend it for a year, with conditions.  The Democratic-controlled Senate voted last week to extend if for two months.  They then hit the road for their weeks-long holiday vacation.

Who’s really looking out for us?

President Barack Obama?  No, he’s looking out for himself.  He was all for a one-year extension but now two months will do.  He’s probably anxious to to join Michelle and the girls on their estimated $4 million, 17-day Hawaiian holiday vacation. He likes to deal with the tough decisions after a little R&R or after the 2012 election.

Obama had planned to veto any tax cut bill that included the construction of an oil pipeline from Canada to Texas.  Then he announced he would delay a decision on the project, which is expected to create thousands of construction jobs, until  after the 2012 election.

This way he doesn’t have to choose between alienating environmentalists who oppose the project and blue collar unions that support it,  the AP also reported.  Is this whom we want leading us for another four years, someone beholden to two powerful special interest groups?

Now Obama’s blasting Republicans for endangering the country’s economic recovery.  He failed to explain how two months of a payroll tax cut and extending unemployment benefits will create tons of new jobs.  Yet he can stand before the cameras and say that the Senate’s bill is “the only viable way to prevent a tax hike on Jan. 1.  The only one.”

My way or the highway.

Interesting isn’t it, how the Democrats had no problem working up until Christmas Eve to pass ObamaCare but wouldn’t stick around to ensure those of us who work a tax break for one year.  Two months was enough for them.  They have holiday shopping to do.

And Obama wants to get to Hawaii.  The audacity of this man and his family.  Michelle couldn’t sit around waiting for her husband to  begin their 17-day holiday vacation, which  The Hawaii Reporter estimated will cost $4 million.  So she and the girls headed out without him.

Where’s the outrage over that?  George W. Bush, whom we’re told over and over and over again is still to blame for the country’s problems, was demonized when he went home to his own ranch for the holidays and for other vacations.

The nation’s First Lady couldn’t care less that her early departure will cost taxpayers roughly $100,000, according to the The Hawaii Reporter and the blog, White House Dossier.  She wants what she wants and that is to soak up the sun and sip on Mai Tais.  See ya when you get here, Barack.

So it comes down to this.  Obama wanted a one-year extension of his payroll tax cut, the Republicans gave it to him, the Democrats did not, and it’s the Republicans who are jeopardizing economic recovery?  They’re the bad guys, the obstructionists?

Who’s out Christmas, sorry, holiday, shopping, and who’s in Washington working for the American people? 

The  only thing Republicans can be blamed for is making Michelle wait for Barack to join her in Hawaii.  But, we’re guessing that she and their daughters are having a grand time living it up without him.

- Betty Roccograndi

Share
 

I didn’t do anything wrong, but here’s $17.75 million anyway.

Now Go Away!  I have more industrial parks to build in my KOZ developments.

Wheeler-dealer Robert Mericle has agreed to pay a whopping $17.75 million to juveniles who were sent to the detention center his company built and to some who were not.  The kids’ parents and lawyers will also line up for their cuts of the princely pie.

Actually, any juvie who was dragged into the dungeon of former Luzerne County tough love judge, Mark Ciavarella, can file a claim even if he or she didn’t sue anybody or land in detention.  The sheer terror of being in Ciavarella’s presence anytime between Jan. 1, 2003 and May 28, 2008 is enough to entitle them to dig into Mericle’s deep pockets.

MERRY CHRISTMAS!

According to the tentative settlement,  Mericle does not admit to any wrongding.  He just thought handing over $17.75 million would be a nice thing to do at this festive time of the year.  And anyone who volunteers to give two county judges almost $2 million for helping him land a contract could well afford it.  So don’t cry for Mericle, Luzerne County.

“It’s so important for the young people of Luzerne County to see that the rich and powerful are not, in the end, above the law,”  said one parent whose then 16-year-old daughter was sent to detention for three months for possessing marijuana.

Might we add that it’s also very important for the county’s young people to see that in the end, crime really does pay.  These little angels didn’t find themselves in juvenile court for selling Girl Scout cookies, now did they?

Said Barry Dyller, one of the lucky lawyers who had the foresight to seek out these kids, ”We are pleased to get this settlement and are thrilled for the kids.  (Not to mention being giddy with delight over our own good fortune.)  Dyller is married to incoming Luzerne County Judge Lesa Gelb.

The poor saps who don’t have Mericle’s millions and who still must face off against the juvenile delinquents in civil court include Ciavarella and his partner in crime, former judge Michael Conahan; and Robert Powell, former co-owner of the  two “Kids for Cash” detention centers.

Attorneys estimate there are 2,400 juveniles and parents eligible to claim a reward, The Times Leader reported Saturday.  The paper on Sunday said lawyers will divvy up $5.3 million.

Now a federal judge must accept Mericle’s offer.  If any person disagrees with the amount of money a claims committee rewards him and decides to go after Mericle on his own, all bets could be off.

The TL says that the agreement allows Mericle to withdraw if he believes that such a scenario would put him at an “unacceptably high” financial risk.  As opposed to the acceptably low financial risk of $17.75 million?

Next up:  Robert Mericle agrees to pay the U.S. Attorneys’s Office $25 million for keeping him out of  prison when he’s eventually sentenced for failing to disclose that he knew that two corrupt Luzerne County judges were up to no good.  But, he’ll admit to no wrongdoing.

- Betty Roccograndi

 

Share
 

In a really creepy stunt, Betsy Summers donned a Santa suit Thursday night and paid a visit to the Wilkes-Barre City council.   We’re still wondering how she got past security.

Santa Summers, who ran for mayor as a Libertarian, said she heard that the council members had been naughty this year.  “Santa doesn’t approve,” she said and came to make them pay.

No matter what you say, Mayor Tom Leighton is beginning to look pretty good right now.

Summers, “rail thin,” as The Citizens’ Voice described her sat before what had to be a stunned council and opened her red sack of tricks – a rubber snake for assistant city attorney William Vinsko and a bottle of Listerine for the departing Tony Thomas.  An ungrateful Thomas did not accept Santa’s generous present.

The Voice reported that Santa’s gift for council Chairwoman Kathy Kane appeared to be a plunger, but she wasn’t feeling well and left the meeting early.  Lucky her.  It’s funny some of the other city officials didn’t pass out.

Santa Summers also brought a gift for Leighton, who trounced her in last month’s mayoral election.  She brought him a Monopoly “Go Directly To Jail” card.  He probably could kick himself for not attending the council meeting and missing out on the all the frivolity.

For sure, the council members were not dreaming of sugar plums dancing in their heads last night.  They were more than likely having nightmares of Weird Al Yankovic’s cuckoo Santa chasing them through  the corridors of City Hall.

And here the council, and in particular Kathy Kane, worried each  time city towing contractor Bob Kadluboski, “Cupcake” to Mayor Leighton, showed up, wondering what he had up his sleeve.

Anyway, this meeting was one for the books. 

It may not have been Merry and Bright, but there was one funny moment when council Vice-Chairman Mike Merritt asked Santa for her name and address for the record.

He has to ask?  Everybody knows it’s Kris Kringle, North Pole.

- Betty Roccograndi

Share
 

This is indeed very welcome news.

The incoming members of our very first Luzerne County council are enthused with the caliber of applicants for our very first county manager.

The best comment, by far, was from one candidate who is viewing this job as a World Series opportunity to reform our county.  And after what we’ve just gone through, we need someone with that mindset.

Is it really possible that we are about to turn a corner? That the days of no-bid contracts, cronyism, political hirings are coming to an end?

Is there such a thing as Home Rule for school boards?  If only there were.

It’s incredible that one doesn’t even need a high school diploma to run and get elected to a school board.  They’re nothing more than popularity contests as are elections for district justices.  Take a look around at the credentials of some of our county’s district justices.  We address them as your honor, and most of them don’t even have law degrees.

Well, at least the county seems to be heading in the right direction.

But in all seriousness, something has to be done to abolish the school board system. Some of these yahoos should not be hiring teachers and making, in some cases,  million dollar decisions when they’re not smart enough to run a lemonade stand, like that adorable Suzy in those Verizon commercials.

- Betty Roccograndi

Share
 

This story is too nutty to be believed.

On a 6-3 vote last week, Pittston Area School directors actually canned a new policy for hiring teachers, one based on college grade point average,  job experience, subject knowledge, communication skills and other criteria.

To be fair, subject knowledge really was an unreasonable criterion for hiring a teacher.

So the school board reverted to its pre-corruption probe policy for hiring teachers, selecting them, if it so wished, on the basis of whom they know and how much they’re willing to pay.  Who cares about job experience anyway when Sonny needs a job?

The school board members had a very good reason for ditching the new, sensible hiring policy.  No one was following it, new board member Anthony Guariglia said.

Do you hear that kids?  If your teachers tell you to read three chapters in your history book by next week, just say no one else is and mention that you got the idea from your role models – the school directors who run your district.

So we need to ask, how did Mr. Guariglia know that the new policy was being ignored.  Did someone get a job who maybe shouldn’t have while the short-lived policy was in effect?  Was the most qualified person passed over because someone’s kid needed a job?

We’re being silly here.  That doesn’t happen in Pittston Area, policy or no policy.

Or maybe school director Ross Latona, who introduced the motion to end the “dog and pony show of a policy,” was just thinking ahead.  With that policy gone, no one could accuse the board of violating it or of hypocrisy if it hires a director’s daughter or nephew.

Spoil sport board member Robert Linskey, who with Marilyn Starna and Richard Gorzkowski, voted against repealing the dog and pony policy, asked, “Why would a reasonable person ever do something like this?” Then he answered his own question.  ”It’s going to allow them to basically hire anyone that they want,” or as we might answer it, “Because, obviously, one has to conclude that these six directors are anything but reasonable.

Director Charles Sciandra had other reasons for scrapping the hiring reforms – interviewing candidates wasted administrators’ time (especially if the school board ignored those recommendations afterward) and some teacher candidates found the process grueling.

“It took some painstaking hours to get candidates through it.  Some of the candidates I talked to were pretty frustrated by it,” he actually said.  One of the more novel justifications for revoking an anti-nepotism policy that we’ve heard in awhile.

Did it ever occur to Mr. Sciandra that if it took hours to get a candidate through the pre-hiring process, then perhaps said candidate isn’t cut out for the classroom?

But maybe he has a point.  It’s so much easier on everyone to just pay to play.  This way, no one’s surprised.

Latona said when he saw the dog and pony policy in  practice, “it didn’t live up to my expectations.”  Which are what exactly, considering the policy was passed in the first place to ensure that the most qualified person was hired?

So now we’re guessing that re-opening the door to possible back-room deals will meet his expectations because it most likely will meet the expectations of those living in the Pittston Area School District.  They’ve seen enough of them in the past not  to expect anything else.

- Betty Roccograndi.

 

 

Share
 

The good news is Wilkes-Barre Township plans to enact measures to account for the $100,000 it donates each year to the township fire department.

The bad news is it might be $15,506 too late.

Township Fire Chief John Paul Yuknavich was arrested Tuesday for allegedly stealing $11,800 from a public safety bureau account and going on a spending spree at Sam’s Club and charging $3,706 of personal items on a township credit card.

The arrest followed the issuance of a one-year restraining order against him and pending charges on drunken driving.

How Yuknavich remained fire chief for as long as he did is beyond me.  His brushes with the law go back to 1998 for crying out loud.  The Times Leader’s time line said that following a ruckus in the township fire hall, Yuknavich and firefighter Walter Halecki were found guilty of harassing each other 13 years ago.

In another, more disturbing,  incident, he plead guilty to violating a protection from abuse order his own daughter obtained against him, the TL reported.

Last month, he was charged with threatening to shoot his former girlfriend in the head.  She filed a protection from abuse order against him.  Hopefully, he’ll stay clear of her.  She might want to consider hiring a bodyguard.  Clearly, if all of this is true, this man is out of control and should not be  chief of anything let alone a department relating to public safety.

Surprised that Yuknavich was charged with stealing, township Mayor Carl Kuren said the township might start requiring receipts, the Citizens’ Voice reported.

Might start?  Is he for real?  Who gives someone $100,000 a year and doesn’t require any documentation on how it was spent?  Oh, he probably didn’t realize it was taxpayers’ money.

And how can Kuren or anyone running Wilkes-Barre Twp. be surprised when police began investigating suspected financial irregularities in its volunteer fire department in 2008.  The CV article said Yuknavich had refused to release department financial records.

Maybe there were none.  It’s only now that Kuren said receipts might be required in the future.  He also said that if the township wants to have more control over employees in trouble with the law, it would have to negotiate a better contract with them.  He told the Voice that legal issues were not grounds for termination unless job performance was affected.

So does that  mean that if a township employee robs a bank, he can still work for the township as long as he shows up on time to shovel snow or clean the streets?

Yep, while they’re drafting those new accountability measures, township officials might also want to take a second look at those labor contractss and make a few changes.

- Betty Roccograndi

 

Share
 

Occupying Kansas on Tuesday,  Barack Obama took another swipe at the United States and pledged to continue fighting the economic inequality that exists in this country.

Then the self-proclaimed uniter blasted Republicans for “their philosophy” that “we are better off when everyone is left to fend for themselves and play by their own rules.”

Obama was not channeling Joe the Plumber here as much as he was President Teddy Roosevelt while vowing to fight for fairness at this “make or break moment for the middle class.” Obama chose the site of Roosevelt’s “New Nationalism” address in 1910 for his latest campaign stop to deliver his New Socialism address.

Closer to home, Lackawanna County Commissioner Corey O’Brien got in on the act and declared that the choice is clear:  Obama for re-election.  O’Brien took offense to comments Reince Priebus, chairman of the Republican National Committee, made about Obama’s recent trip to Scranton.  Among other things, Priebus accused Obama of being hyper-partisan.  And we all know he’s not.

Take, for instance, his Occupy Kansas speech Tuesday when he blasted Republicans for wanting to go back to policies that “stacked the deck against middle-class Americans for way too many years” and scolded them for believing that every man should fend for himself.

“I am here to say they are wrong,”  the president said.  Of course they’re wrong.  Everyone, from our Founding Fathers on up,  knows that it is the job of big government to provide for its citizens and that those who are most successful must share their wealth.  That is what makes this country great, enabling those who wish to mooch off the government and off those who worked hard to get to where they are today.

Jumping to Obama’s defense, Corey O’Brien said Obama has done wonders cleaning up the mess he inherited from George W. Bush and “rescuing the economy from the brink of collapse.”   Someone needs to tell Corey that our economy is still on the brink of collapse and billions and billions deeper into debt since Obama took office.

The Democractic Lackawanna County commissioner also said that when Obama was elected, he took “swift action” to provide immediate relief and create jobs.  We really thought he was kidding, but he was serious as he was when he said Obama has put us “on a path to sustainable recovery.”

Try telling that to all those workers whose 401ks have tanked or to all those who want to work but can’t find jobs.

But Corey, who seems like a likeable guy, means well defending his president, although we can’t help but wonder whether he was partaking of the  holiday eggnog when he wrote this  op-ed piece for Wednesday’s Times Leader.

The Wall Street Journal reported Wednesday that “Mr. Obama prepares to stand for re-election amid persistent unemployment and anemic economic growth that have put particular burdens on the middle class.”

That assessment is a little closer to reality than Corey O’Brien’s, that Mr. Obama has kept “the country on the path to recovery.”

And speaking of the fairness Obama declares is lacking in this country, what’s so fair about him taking a 17-day vacation in Hawaii while warning members of Congress that unless they PASS HIS BILL, they may have to remain in Washington and work during the Christmas holiday?

- Betty Roccograndi

Share
Dec 052011
 

Yea, no tax increase.  For now, anyway.

In a heroic move Friday, the lame duck Luzerne County Commissioners decided to let the new part-time county council decide whether to hike property taxes or lay off 150 courthouse employees.  At an estimated cost of $50,000 per employee, the commissioners figured that’s how many need to go to balance the budget.

You may be wondering why county commissioners, past and present, didn’t make the tough decisions before, instead of plunging us into a half-billion dollars in debt.

It’s very simple, they wanted to get re-elected, and laying off politically-connected employees and infuriating their benefactors wasn’t the way to do that.  Then there was that $58-million lease for a privately-owned juvenile detention center and paying Thom Greco a handsome $5.8  million for his Market Street train wreck and spending over $1 million to The Little Red Wagon to store records, which now must be stored elsewhere because we learned that pigeons may have been roosting among the valuable historic documents.

But now as they leave office on the eve of a Home Rule government takeover, our elected officials decide to get lean and mean and slash $3.5 million from next year’s budget because there is  no corresponding incoming revenue.  Of course, we’re grateful for this because that’s the responsible  way to run a business, whose shareholders are its taxpayers.

We’re just wondering why we weren’t considered in the past when the commissioners, past and present, spent our money like it grew on trees.  It was so much easier to keep on borrowing than to gradually cut costs when they were needed.

County commissioners Chairwoman Maryanne Petrilla said she’s very worried about the budget and that “taxpayers can’t afford another tax increase.”  No arguments there.  She also said that “revenue must dictate expenses.”  No kidding.  If commissioners, past and present, lived by that dictum over the years, we wouldn’t be in the  fix we’re in now.

What will Steve Urban do, we wonder, when he joins the council or becomes the new county manager?  He hasn’t said he’s running for the top spot, but we’re guessing he’d like to have it.  As long as it doesn’t go to former county commissioners, Todd Vonderheid or Greg Skrepenak, who’s probably due to get out of prison soon.

The commissioners did not include in the budget a hoped-for bounty of millions of dollars if the sale of a Triple-A baseball franchise goes through or if the former Valley Crest Nursing Home is sold or if Donald Trump drops by and decides to buy the demolished Hotel Sterling site.

I know they’ll be some who disagree with me, especially county Prothonotary Carolee Medico who believes Petrilla is a vindictive witch for slashing her budget, but I believe that Petrilla really tried to help the county.  Maybe not while she was county controller but after she split with Skrepenak and became chairwoman.

I still wonder to this day how she and her team got us out of that monstrous juvie lease.  If they didn’t, county taxpayers would have been stuck with that obscene contract for another 15 years.

As for Urban, thank goodness he was there protesting some of the reckless decisions of Skrepenak and Vonderheid.  He’ll make a fine council member.  Tom Cooney seemed to be a serious leader also, and county residents should be grateful for his service.

So now we’re venturing into uncharted waters with Home Rule, and we can only hope our new leaders will run the county like the multi-million dollar business that it is.

To think what we could be spending $4.2 million on instead of for our 2012 debt repayment installment.

- Betty Roccograndi

Share
 

No one gets away with taking out a $6 million loan and not paying it back.

No one, that is, with the possible exception of  CityVest.

Luzerne County loaned this non-profit group a reported $6 million to use toward restoring to its former grandeur the old Hotel Sterling, which is now likely a moldy, rodent infested shell.  It never even boarded up the windows.  Now, $6 million later, the structure is headed for the wrecking ball.

And just like that, CityVest waltzed away from its obligation to pay this money back to Luzerne County taxpayers.  And as far as we can see, Luzerne County officials have done nothing to stop it.  What the lame duck Luzerne County commissioners did do is authorize a $1 million bailout to demolish CityVest’s building because CityVest says it’s broke.

The commissioners had no choice here since the building has become a serious safety hazard.  This handout does not have to be paid back, but at least the county plans to sell the vacant lot to recoup “some” of  its money.

Well, finally, a federal grand jury is on the case and has ordered the county to send it all the records pertaining to this failed project by next week.

Thankfully, someone’s taking this obscene loan default seriously.

For starters, maybe the grand jury will take a look at the “Confession of Judgement” CityVest agreed to.  That powerful contract term “authorizes and empowers the prothonotary or clerk or any attorney of any court of record in the United States” to record a judgment against the loan receipient and in favor of the county “for the entire balance due.”

The entire balance due is $6 million.  We’d like to know if the county acted on this confession of judgment and, if not, why not, when CityVest Chairman Y. Judd Shoval and Executive Director Alex Rogers signed a Nov. 6, 2002 “Borrower’s Certificate,”  stating that the “Borrower is aware of, fully understands and acknowledges the terms and effect of such confession of judgment.”

While they’re at it, maybe the federal grand jury will examine the promissory note the county presumably obtained before handing over $6 million to CityVest.  That note would require CityVest to pay back its taxpayer-funded loan if it defaulted.  It defaulted.

Maybe the grand jury will also demand to know why CityVest paid a former Wilkes-Barre couple, Gregory and Stephanie Lull, $325,000 for an adjacent property, which the couple bought in 1997 for $185,000, according to The Times Leader.  And why it did so when the city of Wilkes-Barre had a $303,000 lien against the property.

Not only did CityVest pay the Lulls, who now live in Maine, $140,000 more than they paid for the property, it also paid off the city’s lien.  That would raise the suspicion of even us non-lawyer types.

The Citizens’ Voice  reported that Todd Vonderheid, a former Luzerne County commissioner, who recently resigned as the head of the Greater Wilkes-Barre Chamber of Business and Industry, and Larry  Newman, the chamber’s vice president of policy, planning and development, co-signed a mortgage loan to help the Lulls purchase the property.

Hmmmmm.  Now, that’s very interesting.  We’d like to know a little bit more about the Lulls and why two area power brokers would co-sign a loan for them.

Maybe the federal grand jury will be curious also. 

It is very good news that the feds are involved, especially considering that local officials don’t seem to want to touch this one, which is simply incredible considering there’s $6 million on the line – $6 million of taxpayers’  money.

- Betty Roccograndi

Share
 

“Don’t be a Grinch,” is what jolly old President Barack Obama said we must tell our members of Congress.

Drawing inspiration from that endearing holiday classic, “The Republicans Who Stole Christmas,” Obama urged us to press our representatives to not raise our taxes during the holidays and to not end unemployment benefits during this festive season.

Okay, we’ll play along.  Congressman Barletta, Congressman Marino, get in the Christmas spirit, will you, and “DO YOUR JOB.  PASS THIS BILL!

Obama came to Scranton High School yesterday to rally us to his cause, which is helping the middle class “get a leg up,” because we all know that Republicans are hellbent in bringing down the middle class to help their zillionaire buddies on Wall Street.

The president in his unnecessary half-hour pit stop in Scranton said that because he’s in the Christmas spirit, he’s going to give the Grinches in Congress another chance to redeem themselves by extending  his payroll tax cut and making the wealthiest among us pay for it.

If Congress doesn’t act, he said, “then most of you are going to see your taxes go up $1,000 at the worst posssible time.” PASS THIS BILL, or it “will be a massive blow for the economy,” Obama warned.

A massive blow?   Does he mean like the half-billion dollars in guaranteed loans to a solar panel company which went bankrupt?  Or the Cash for Clunkers program which fizzled?  Or the billions of dollars in stimulus spending which netted little?

Pandering to working class Scrantonians before heading to New York City to sip cocktails with the millionaires he vilfies, Obama told the local yokels that he loves Sen. Bob Casey.

And the feeling is apparently mutual.  Casey said, “I’d like to welcome President Obama to my hometown of Scranton to discuss a critical issue for working class families in Northeastern Pennsylvania and the Commonwealth.”   The only thing wrong with that picture was that Obama was in Scranton and Casey welcomed him from Washington.  If that doesn’t make Casey a Grinch, what does?

Obama was on a roll in  Scranton, saying, “Let’s ask the folks who’ve gotten bigger tax breaks under Bush” to pay their fair share.  In case you didn’t already know this, George W. Bush is the king of the Grinches.

We can’t know for sure whether Obama asked the Bush cronies to pay their fair share when he hobnobbed with them later in the day on the upper East Side of New York City.

But like a sleazy ambulance chaser, Obama can playa both sides of the fence with equal aplomb.

In Scranton, Obama said he’s done pretty well over the past few years and wants to give more , ”so you guys can have a leg up.”

In New York at the home of a Jewish leader where 30 donors forked over $10,000 each, Obama said Israel is America’s greatest ally.  We think Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu might wonder about that after Obama was caught in an open-mike moment not long ago complaining that he has to deal with Netanyahu on a daily basis.

Tugging at the heartstrings of Scrantonians, though, Obama said we need to think about the immigrants who came here  and what they stood for.  “I don’t know about you, but I want Malia and Sasha” to grow up respecting the values we inherited from our parents and grandparents, he said.

Now wait a minute, didn’t Obama throw his Grandma under the bus when he chided her for checking over her shoulder, like most white folks, whenever she suspected a black man might be following her?

But the president is right, we have to look out for one another.  Like Hillary said, “It takes a village.”

That’s why after sucking up to Scranton, the  president, as the New York Daily News put it, went on a buck-raking blitz, tapping wealthy donors at three coffer-boosting fundraisers.

Ambulance chaser.

- Betty Roccograndi

Share
© 2010 PureBunkum Contact Betty Roccograndi / Contact The Plumber Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha